Ok, so if my previous reposts about National and Labour remained fairly unchanged in their analysis then what I wrote about Peters being kingmaker (and have been repeatedly saying since) may have to be reevaluated in the wake of the recent plunge of NZ Firsts polling (to 8%) and the sharp rise of Maori/Mana (to 4%).
In short the rise of Maori/Mana to 4% gives them enough to go with National (as it currently stands) to see off not just a Labour/Greens alliance but even one with NZ First in it as well!
The net result would be to reduce Winston and NZ First to nothing. Sure Winston could go into a coalition with National/Maori but they would not have to take him and he would be adding nothing particular to the mix as any seats NZ First has would only bolster the already entrenched National/Maori position.
So if this kind of polling continues its a very different game for Winston to play (and also for the 2017 Election), one where he has only one card left and its a deuce.
Of course all this is predicated on Maori/Mana maintaining its popularity as well as NZ First remaining where it is and we all know how good Winston can be on the campaign trail so I don't expect that lowly 8% to stay as it is because if anyone can claw back his popularity in the polls its him.
That said I do get the sense that this is the last hurrah for Winston, and NZ First. There cant be much left in the tank so to speak and the dynamics of politics has moved on from the days when it was simply a case of whipping up town hall meeting after town hall meeting with his populist magic.
Winston is a product of another age and in this time and space his political style is running on mostly nostalgia not anything which is new or appealing.
So like a lot of other old bands from back in the day which decide to go out on the road and make a few bucks thrashing out the hits to a room full of grey haired hipsters, all desperately trying to get back their youth, so to is Winston shaking his mojo for almost the exact same grey haired, hipster crowd, and it cant go on for ever (lest he or they throw their hips out).
Therefore, poll shifts notwithstanding, this is likely to be the last run for Winston. The rumors about political mercenary Shane Jones have abounded for over a year (much to the disgust of long serving NZ First 2IC Ron mark) and a good result would likley see Winston cement some sort of legacy in NZ by helping enact a needed shift or following through with his knee jerk political instincts and letting things remain as they are.
Or if the polls remain low then its will be a painful fade away as NZ First looses its ability to decide the fate of NZ and possibly even Northland rejects him.
The key now for Winston is the polls, he not only has to get NZ First back up but also find a way to keep Maori/Mana down and while the first is doable the second is out of his hands.
Maori/Mana's 4% is a serious threat to Winston and at the end of this such a position might drive him into the arms of Labour and the Greens as the only alternative to cosying up with National is to make a deal with the other side by having enough seats to outdo any National/Maori coalition.
The only thing that remains consistent in all this is that Winston Peters is a survivor. But like Rooster Cogburn in True Grit (one of my favorite movies) its a lonely way to survive and one which leaves no real legacy, just memories.
It’s been nearly 40 years since Winston Peters first entered parliament as
an MP (1978) and over 40 since he entered politics (joining National in 1975).
In that time he has run the gamut of politics many times and held almost
every position in government imaginable (MP, party leader, cabinet member,
Minister, opposition MP, leader of party with no seats) as well as been
investigated (and cleared) by the Serious Fraud Office, censured by parliaments
privileges committee and been the recipient of secret donations from wealthy
businessmen.
The man was also the instigator of Winebox Inquiry, fought and squabbled
with more than one Prime Minister, been exiled from various cabinets, left one
political party, formed one of his own and rumored to be the patron saint of
one small special branch of a larger government department.
Winston Peters is the James Brown of New Zealand politics: a skilled and
dynamic entertainer who always gives good show but is a dictatorial bandleader
who overworked and under paid his backing bands (The Tight Five is to Winston
as the Famous Flames are to James) all to enhance his own reputation.
To be sure he (Winston not James) is highly entertaining and rarely fails
to provide an entertaining quote or attention grabbing headline but the
substance of his actions have rarely lived up to his hype (unlike James) and
his effect on politics or NZ as a whole (super gold card aside) is divisive at
best and possibly toxic at its worst.
But like him or loath him he has survived many of his friends and critics
and seen off more than one challenger to his rule of NZ First. At its simplest
Winston Peters is a political survivor.
He survived the 2008 blowout of NZ First which saw many write him off only
to come back in 2011 (with a respectable 8% in the polls) and then pull off one
of the most astounding upsets in New Zealand Politics by not only breaching the
walls of National stronghold Northland but taking it convincingly (over 50%) in
his first ever time campaigning there.
But what Winston is really known for and what has made him such an
enduring figure on the New Zealand political landscape (one littered with
wanna-be greats, has-beens and also-rans along with many forgettable
politicians and PMs) is the fact that he has been instrumental in maintaining
not one, but two minority governments (National in 1996 and Labour in 2005) in
their hour of need and in doing so set them up for their later defeat by
allowing them to succumb to third term arrogance.
Few who lived through 1996 can forget how heated the election campaign
got, the visible anger on Bolgers face during his and Peters famous shouting
matches. Winston all but pledged on his mother’s grave that he would never go
with National and that it was time for a change and then went with National
after nearly two months of protracted negotiations haggling in New
Zealand’s first ever MMP election; thereby denying Helen Clark the chance to be
the first ever female PM and dooming New Zealand to three more years of the
National Governments neo-liberal frenzy of privatization, deregulation and
Business Round Table gibberish.
Still the glove was on the other foot when in 2005 Winston was back and
this time doing what said he would do nine years earlier, supporting Labour in
a collation government. But things had changed as it was now Labour that was
struggling to maintain its lead and National under Brash managed to get 39% of
the vote and would have been government had Winnie gone with his old alma mater
like previously. Instead he backed a grateful Helen, got a swag full of
political spoil and set Labour up for the very same fall National got when he
supported them in 96.
It’s an interesting counterfactual to consider how things would have been
like had Winston gone the other way (Labour in 1996 and National in 2005).
Would things have been any different? The persistent and apocryphal myth around
Wellington is that in the wake of Nationals disintegration in 99 and the early
2000’s Helen Clark was thankful that Winston had gone with National at the
time, only forget the warning of history when she turned to him for support in
05 (and suffered the same fate as Shipley and Co).
You would almost think he had done it just for some sort of kinky thrill
and with an election in 2017 looming and NZ First currently holding at 9% in
the polls Winston may again be in the position to decide who is in power and
who is PM. But the hand of support he offers has proven to be short term
political expediency followed by long term electoral toxicity.*
But unlike 1996, 2017 will not see National desperately trying to get a
third term or deeply unpopular in the polls (not unless John Key is found out
to be an extremely skilled chatbot between now and then) and with no clear
pretenders to the throne (Labour in disunity at 28% and Greens at 10% would not
be enough to do it alone against National at their current polling of 50%) the
key figure under current polling projections is the one, and only, Winston
Peters.
But there are some complications in the script which Key and National are
sure to try and exploit and one of those likely to get exploited if they are
not careful will be Winston Peters.
To start, Winston is genuinely opposed to the Greens and has previously mooted
going into coalition govt with them. That means that NZ First would not back a
Labour government if the Greens were also part of the package. This leaves
Labour with the near impossible task of making up the missing support (getting
around 40% of the vote) to enable it to form a government with the Greens if NZ
First will not support them.
So if Labour cannot get enough support to jettison the Greens (something
they would love to do anyway) and Winston will not come to the party and this
leaves him with only two options: stay independent or support National (either
in coalition or tacitly) because if Labour cannot form a government then John
Key will rule for a fourth term by default.
The only alternative to this scenario is that Winston swallows his pride
and decides to go into coalition with Labour and the Greens. This is not an
impossible scenario but it’s less likely than him rejecting anything to do with
the Greens.
It would be an uneasy alliance at best and possibly way too volatile,
given Winston’s track record of grandstanding and political belligerence, to
survive for long. The net result of such a coalition collapsing would be an
electoral bloodbath as Labour would have blown its golden opportunity to get
back into power while National would swoop like rabid wolves on a straggling
sheep.
Finally making this all the more toxic is the question of where he is
cobbling his votes from. Conventional wisdom would say from National or the
undecided middle (Winston is long past having any credible electoral draw on
the Left after his betrayal in 96) but I suspect that the rising theme of
electoral insurrection in the world today may end up seeing anyone who promises
to “smash the pointy headed bastards in the capital” getting increased vote
share based purely on their angry rhetoric, push button messaging and
opposition stance. Which is a situation tailor made for Winston Peters.
Winston extracted maximum gain for himself in both 96 and 05 but failed to
see out a single governmental term in the governments he kept alive (probably
because his support was only a superficial fix for deeper structural problems).
In 98, after Jenny Shipley ran her noisy coup on Jim Bolger in public (in
direct opposition to National Party tradition of keeping the bloodletting behind
closed doors), Winston was kicked from cabinet due to endless squabbling with
her and promptly took his toys (read support for government) and went home.
In 2005 he was rather quicker in the courtship but wanted a lot more bling
to walk down the aisle only to turn out to be a lethal political liability as
he was engulfed in various dodgy scandals that left his legacy in tatters
(except for the devout worship in the afore mentioned section of government and
the horse racing industry which reaped a financial windfall from his tenure as
Minister for Racing which continues to this day) and saw NZ First go below the
five percent threshold and Winston get driven out of his long term seat of
Tauranga.
In the wake of all this many said that it was the end of Winston but he
said it was not and vowed to return. And surprise surprise he was right, after
a comeback in 2011 he expanded that in 2014 and then stole Northland from
National in 2015.
And if the 2017 election rolls around and current polling continues then
the man who may decide the outcome will be the same man who previously keep
alive two struggling and unpopular governments in the face of calls for change.
Out of such a situation Winston may walk like a phoenix from the fire; the
comeback kid and kingmaker again squarely in the middle and ready to decide the
fate of NZ. What his price may be and what costs will be borne by the country
are yet not known but the man is no fool and he will have gauged the coming
mood well (as his electoral Blitzkrieg in Northland showed) and be playing to
get maximum gain for himself.
It would be incorrect to label Winston a simple populist (or demagogue)
but neither is he a democrat or man of the people. Any benefits accrued by the
electorate from his presence in government are mostly secondary to keeping him
in politics. He is a one man political brand and when he does decide to get out
of the game NZ First will on death watch but NZ politics will be a lot less
colorful.
* – I’m not really blaming Winston for the political degradation of
both Labour and National in modern times but it makes an interesting
hypothesis.
Sounds Good,
ReplyDeleteI like to read your blog. You shared a wonderful information about business card display nz. Thanks for sharing this amazing stuff in this post.